Stage 1 of 4
Bring the records together
Pull the relevant numbers from the systems your team already uses, including browser-only back offices.
Read
- Site A
- 30 units available
- Site B
- stock constrained
- Sales ledger
- RM41/day vs RM309/day
They read every site, cost the next move, and hold each decision for your approval.
Nightly read finished. Two sites reconciled, one product line flagged:
Held for you
Awaiting approvalWhy an agent, and not a report
01Stock, purchasing, capacity, exceptions. The numbers are already there, spread across the business. Nobody gets to them in time, and the report only tells you what happened after the month is over.
Works inside the systems you run
The decision loop
02The evidence, the options, the approval, the action, and what happened next. All in one place.
Stage 1 of 4
Pull the relevant numbers from the systems your team already uses, including browser-only back offices.
Read
Sample agents
03Showing 7 of 30
Ran in pilot Stock
P-1Move stock you already own before raising an order.
From the record
30 units moved between two sites before any purchase; RM114/day recoverable, estimated.
Seven agents from the dated multi-site pilot.
Start with this agentRan in pilot Stock
P-2Stop restocking what has stopped selling, and free the cash.
From the record
RM2,981 of stock on a stalled line identified for clearance in the pilot; cash freed, estimated.
Seven agents from the dated multi-site pilot.
Start with this agentRan in pilot Purchasing
P-3Hold spend that duplicates stock already owned elsewhere.
From the record
A RM960 purchase rejected because the stock was already owned at another site.
Seven agents from the dated multi-site pilot.
Start with this agentRan in pilot Purchasing
P-4Raise the order when nothing else covers it, sized to the cover left.
From the record
48 units, about two cartons, raised with 7 days of cover left; RM237/day recoverable, estimated.
Seven agents from the dated multi-site pilot.
Start with this agentRan in pilot Capacity
P-5Decide which assets to adjust tonight, and how far, within the crew's capacity.
From the record
One asset adjusted slightly in the pilot; RM130/day recoverable, estimated.
Seven agents from the dated multi-site pilot.
Start with this agentRan in pilot Yield
P-6Rank every asset by what it earns against the typical asset at its site.
From the record
Ran nightly in the pilot; every recommendation on this page was checked against this ranking before it reached a person.
Seven agents from the dated multi-site pilot.
Start with this agentRan in pilot Exceptions
P-7Escalate only what passes your own rules, so alerts stay worth reading.
From the record
Tuned to fire once or twice a day; an alarm that cries wolf gets ignored.
Seven agents from the dated multi-site pilot.
Start with this agentHigh-SKU retail Demand
R-1Predict what each product sells at each store, every day, including the long tail.
Published figure, not ours
20 to 50% fewer forecast errors; 30 to 50% less fresh waste (McKinsey, RELEX).
One agent per use case in a published retail implementation study.
Start with this agentHigh-SKU retail Stock
R-2Turn the forecast into orders that respect case packs, shelf space, and lead times.
Published figure, not ours
10 to 40% less spoilage; 20 to 30% less safety stock (RELEX, McKinsey).
One agent per use case in a published retail implementation study.
Start with this agentHigh-SKU retail Pricing
R-3Price the long tail; mark down perishables while they can still sell. People keep the known-value items.
Published figure, not ours
+2 to 5 points of margin; 33 to 47% less fresh waste (Competera, Wasteless). Person-level pricing excluded.
One agent per use case in a published retail implementation study.
Start with this agentHigh-SKU retail Availability
R-4Compare what is on the shelf with what should be, and raise the fixes in order.
Published figure, not ours
2 to 4 points of on-shelf availability (vendor-claimed); price-tag verification is the consistent quick win.
One agent per use case in a published retail implementation study.
Start with this agentHigh-SKU retail Checkout
R-5Catch missed scans and recognise produce at self-checkout, and prompt the shopper first.
Published figure, not ours
More than 75% of self-checkout errors self-corrected (Kroger).
One agent per use case in a published retail implementation study.
Start with this agentHigh-SKU retail Loss
R-6Watch existing cameras for theft behaviour and send only the alerts worth acting on.
Published figure, not ours
About 60% shrink reduction on covered categories (vendor-reported, directional).
One agent per use case in a published retail implementation study.
Start with this agentHigh-SKU retail Availability
R-7Spot empty shelves, and correct the record that says they are full.
Published figure, not ours
Out-of-stocks cost about 4% of grocery sales (industry rule of thumb); fixing phantom inventory is where camera ROI compounds.
One agent per use case in a published retail implementation study.
Start with this agentHigh-SKU retail Offers
R-8Predict what each household buys, target the offer, and pick the substitution.
Published figure, not ours
+16 to 27% conversion or basket lift; about 95% shopper approval of AI-picked substitutions (Instacart).
One agent per use case in a published retail implementation study.
Start with this agentHigh-SKU retail Customers
R-9Handle order status, refunds, and refill calls end to end, and route the rest.
Published figure, not ours
Plan on 40 to 55% of contacts handled without staff; vendors advertise 70 to 80% (Zendesk measured median 41%).
One agent per use case in a published retail implementation study.
Start with this agentHigh-SKU retail Logistics
R-10Route the trucks, predict real lead times, and cut the safety stock that stale averages force.
Published figure, not ours
5 to 10% fuel and 10 to 30% transport cost from route optimisation; about 15% logistics cost (McKinsey).
One agent per use case in a published retail implementation study.
Start with this agentHigh-SKU retail People
R-11Forecast traffic in 15-minute steps and build schedules that respect the rules and the people.
Published figure, not ours
About 15% average labour-cost savings; one grocer cut wait times 30% (industry benchmark).
One agent per use case in a published retail implementation study.
Start with this agentHigh-SKU retail Pharmacy
R-12Pre-fill prior authorisations, process routine refills, route exceptions. A pharmacist decides.
Published figure, not ours
83% reduction in prior-authorisation turnaround (CoverMyMeds); AI never makes the final prescription decision.
One agent per use case in a published retail implementation study.
Start with this agentHigh-SKU retail Finance
R-13Match supplier invoices to orders and receipts line by line, post the clean ones, route the rest.
Published figure, not ours
Best-in-class US$2.78 and 3.1 days per invoice against US$10.89 and 10.9 days average.
One agent per use case in a published retail implementation study.
Start with this agentManufacturing Production
M-1Recommend set-points and rebuild the schedule against real constraints, in minutes.
Published figure, not ours
10 to 20% production output improvement described as a well-supported target (Deloitte); +15 to 25% OEE (vendor claims).
One agent per department in a published study of large Malaysian manufacturers.
Start with this agentManufacturing Quality
M-2Inspect every unit on every shift, isolate what fails, and draft the CAPA.
Published figure, not ours
Defect escapes −94%, defect rate −87% in named vendor cases; human inspection 70 to 80% against AI vision 95 to 99% (vendor claim).
One agent per department in a published study of large Malaysian manufacturers.
Start with this agentManufacturing Maintenance
M-3Repair in the next planned window instead of on the night it breaks.
Published figure, not ours
30 to 50% less downtime, 10 to 40% lower maintenance cost (McKinsey); PETRONAS reported RM73.1 million at 14× return in year one.
One agent per department in a published study of large Malaysian manufacturers.
Start with this agentManufacturing Supply chain
M-4Project the shortfall, draft the replenishment, check the lead time, route it for a yes.
Published figure, not ours
Forecast error −30 to 50%; inventory −20 to 30%; lost sales from stock-outs down by up to 65% (McKinsey).
One agent per department in a published study of large Malaysian manufacturers.
Start with this agentManufacturing Procurement
M-5Classify the spend, benchmark the price, find the mismatch, and put buyers back to negotiating.
Published figure, not ours
15 to 22% more savings opportunities identified than rules-based classification (vendor claim); procurement controls 50 to 70% of spend with 1 to 2% of headcount.
One agent per department in a published study of large Malaysian manufacturers.
Start with this agentManufacturing People
M-6Screen at volume, forecast absenteeism, and answer SOP questions in the worker's own language.
Published figure, not ours
Time-to-hire −47% (SAP-cited, vendor claim); treat anything above 50% sceptically.
One agent per department in a published study of large Malaysian manufacturers.
Start with this agentManufacturing Finance
M-7Capture and three-way match invoices, validate e-Invoicing, catch duplicates and mis-postings.
Published figure, not ours
US$15.97 to US$2.36 per invoice, an 85% reduction (Ardent Partners 2025); 17.4 to 3.1 days per invoice.
One agent per department in a published study of large Malaysian manufacturers.
Start with this agentManufacturing Sales
M-8Draft compliant quotes from spec sheets and past bids, and flag the deals that erode margin.
Published figure, not ours
Recovering 0.5 to 1.0 point of gross margin on RM500 million of revenue is RM2.5 to 5 million (study estimate).
One agent per department in a published study of large Malaysian manufacturers.
Start with this agentManufacturing Orders
M-9Enter customer POs from PDFs and email, answer status questions, route complaints to CAPA.
Published figure, not ours
+14% issues resolved per hour, +34% for novice workers (Brynjolfsson, Li and Raymond, QJE, peer-reviewed).
One agent per department in a published study of large Malaysian manufacturers.
Start with this agentManufacturing Compliance
M-10Watch existing CCTV for unsafe acts, assemble the audit evidence, draft the non-conformances.
Published figure, not ours
−62% safety-vest incidents (NSG) and −86% vehicle incidents (Piston), vendor-named customers. Any CCTV use needs a PDPA impact assessment.
One agent per department in a published study of large Malaysian manufacturers.
Start with this agentAfter approval
04This is where a chat assistant stops. Opero carries the approved decision into the systems and teams that need to act, then checks that it actually happened.
Is this your operation
05Opero works best when a few things are already true.
Requirements
Start read-only. Prove the first decision.
Return date agreed upfront.
Choose the first part of the operation to work on and agree what a useful result looks like.
We learn the records, rules, exceptions, and who has authority to approve what.
Opero reads, but changes nothing. You can compare its recommendations with the decisions your team actually made.
One real recommendation, with the evidence and expected cost, held for approval.
Once approved, Opero carries it through and comes back to measure what happened.
Questions operators ask first
06Opero starts by watching. It only gets permission to do more once it has shown that it can make the right call consistently.
Reads the operation. Sends nothing. Changes nothing.
Shows what it found, the options, and what each one is likely to cost.
Anything consequential waits for a person to say yes.
Opero can only make changes in the systems and categories you have explicitly enabled.
Routine decisions can become more automatic over time, if you choose.
Some decisions can stay approval-only forever. In our pilot, automatic approval is still switched off.
Questions
If there is something we have not covered, email hello@opero.ai. For deployment, access, and data controls, see the security page.
Not on arrival. A fresh install sends nothing, writes nothing, and auto-approves nothing. Routine categories can earn auto-approval after at least 95% human agreement across at least 20 decisions on at least 8 nights, and the consequential ones can require your approval forever. In our pilot, auto-approval is still switched off.
No. It is the normal case. Usually a login is enough: Opero drives the back office the way a manager does, through a real browser. Google Sheets and CSV exports count as records too.
Each customer has a separate installation. Settings, connected-system logins, and operating data live with you and are not shared between customers. Opero reads only the systems you connect, and customer data is not used to train a model shared with other customers. The security page states only the controls the current product supports.
Nothing, until someone says yes. Every recommendation points to the original records and can never alter a number; where a figure is an estimate, it is labelled as one. Your disagreement is logged against the decision, and a category only earns more room by being right, decision after decision.
A kill switch pauses the system from the dashboard, and changes to your systems can be switched off per site at any time without removing read access. Every recommendation, approval, change, and reversal sits in a log that can only be added to, with who did it and through which channel.
Per site. The scope, the boundary, and the price are agreed with you before anything is connected.
Who builds this
07One of us spent years running the kind of operation Opero reads. The other builds the systems that read it.
Chief executive
Built and operates a multi-site claw machine arcade business, where stock, pricing, purchasing, and capacity decisions were previously made by hand every night.
Credentials
Chief technology officer
Works in machine learning and computational neuroscience, with published research and top results in large international AI competitions.
Credentials
Start with a real operating week
Send us one week where stock, purchasing, capacity, or another operating decision went wrong. We will work through the records with your operator and come back with one costed decision, the evidence behind it, and what Opero would have done. No integration required.